Arctic nations and NGOs call on UN shipping agency to drop world’s dirtiest fuel


arcticAs delegates gather next week in London for an International Maritime Organization meeting, a coalition of international non-governmental organisations, The Clean Arctic Alliance, is calling for an end to the use of heavy fuel oil (HFO) in Arctic waters.

HFO is used by many ships operating in Arctic waters, and poses a severe risk to fragile marine environments and the coastal communities that depend upon them.

The IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee meets from October 24th to 28th and discussions relating to shipping fuels will likely predominate as the body also considers deadlines for setting sulfur limits in fuels.

Virtually impossible to clean up, HFO is a toxic, tar-like sludge that breaks down very slowly, particularly in the cold Arctic waters. The Arctic Council, which deals with the issues faced by the Arctic governments and Arctic indigenous peoples, has identified potential spills of heavy fuel oil as the top threat posed by Arctic shipping.

Burning heavy fuel oil also emits significant quantities of black carbon, potent in accelerating the already rapid pace of Arctic climate change. When black carbon falls on light-coloured surfaces, such as Arctic snow and ice, it reduces the amount of sunlight reflected back into space. This process can accelerate snow and ice melt, increase the surface area of exposed, dark ocean water, and promote a self-reinforcing cycle of land and sea ice melting and climate warming.

Arctic waters include some of the world’s most productive ocean ecosystems, providing sustenance to large populations of whales, seals, and walruses and seabirds. Some of the world’s highest volume fisheries rely on the incredibly productive Arctic waters. Ending the use of HFO in Arctic waters is one way to protect these ecosystems – and the momentum to achieve this is growing.

“The International Maritime Organization must begin the immediate phase-out of heavy fuel oils from Arctic waters”, said Sian Prior, Advisor to the Clean Arctic Alliance international coalition of NGOs.

“We urge the International Maritime Organization to adopt a legally binding instrument to end the use of HFO as marine fuel in Arctic waters by 2020.”

During the IMO meeting, a panel of Arctic indigenous speakers from Russia, the United States, and Canada will address the IMO, United Nations’ agency which sets rules for international shipping, at the invitation the Clean Arctic Alliance, in a 30-minute session focusing on the need for ongoing indigenous engagement from the IMO.

The speakers, including Eduard Zdor and of the Association of Traditional Marine Mammal Hunters of Chukotka, Hans Lennie of the Inuvik Hunters and Trappers Committee and the Inuvialuit Game Council, and Tagak Curley, considered one of the Fathers of Nunavut for his role in negotiating and establishing the territory, will outline the benefits and threats posed by shipping to food security and way of life in the north. They are expected to discuss specific measures the MEPC can take, including banning HFO, in order to eliminate spill risk and emissions impacts, as well as taking stronger environmental provisions in the Polar Code. The IMO is currently not advised by an indigenous delegation when setting shipping policy.

In early September, the United States and Canada formally notified the International Maritime Organization that a “heavy fuel oil spill in the Arctic could cause long-term damage to the environment”. This follows March 2016 commitments made by US President Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau to “determine with Arctic partners how best to address the risks posed by heavy fuel oil use and black carbon emissions from Arctic shipping”.  As well, last month the Danish political party Venstre and the Danish Shipowner’s Association, an Arctic cruise sector leader called for regulating or banning the use of HFO in the Arctic.

Due to its dangers, heavy fuel oil is already banned throughout Antarctica and and in the national park waters around the Norwegian Arctic archipelago of Svalbard,  leaving a strictly regulated corridor for ships to access the islands.

But, heavy fuel oil has yet to be regulated in Arctic waters.

The Arctic marine environment is remote, dangerous, fragile, and severe. Storms routinely reach hurricane force, waters are ice-filled and poorly mapped, communication systems can easily fail, and substantive spill response or search and rescue can be thousands of miles and weeks away.

Phasing out HFO, and replacing it with cleaner, more efficient fuels – such as so-called transition fuels, like LNG or lighter distillate fuels, is a step in the right direction, the Alliance says. It is calling for the shipping industry to move away from fossil-fueled shipping as the most direct way to cut the risks catastrophic oil spills, and reducing CO2 and black carbon harmful emissions in the Arctic region.

“Phasing out HFO for fuel in Arctic waters is the most direct mechanism for mitigating the numerous consequences of an HFO spill and reducing harmful emissions in the Arctic region,” concluded Ms Prior.